Preclinical WebsiteClinical Website

Biospective has industry-leading expertise in providing microglia histology & advanced image services, including multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) staining using a variety of antibodies for comprehensive microglial phenotyping. We have developed proprietary image analysis and image visualization capabilities for microglial morphology, cell-cell interactions, and spatial analysis.

Explore our Services

Multiplex immunofluorescence staining, segmentation, morphological and spatial analysis of microglia in tissue sections from rodent models.

Microglia are central determinants of central nervous system (CNS) homeostasis and disease progression across major indications, including:

  • Alzheimer’s disease (AD)

  • Tauopathy-related dementias (e.g. FTD, CBD, PSP)

  • Parkinson’s disease (PD)

  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

  • Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

Quantitative analysis of microglial features, including density, morphology-based activation state scoring, and neuron-associated contact topology, is critical for measuring disease progression and therapeutic response. Biospective has developed robust multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) staining and automated whole-slide quantification workflows optimized for pathology-centric microenvironment profiling and microglia–neuron interaction endpoints in rodent CNS tissues.

Our Microglia Staining & Image Analysis Capabilities

Iba1-based Microgliosis Quantification

  • Whole-slide Iba1 stain density quantification and regional burden within specified regions-of-interest, minimizing sampling bias and supporting cohort-scale comparisons.

Microglia Segmentation and Morphology-based Activation Profiling

  • Whole-slide detection and classification of microglia.

  • High-content morphometrics extracted from Iba1-positive cells and analyzed with trained, validated machine-learning models to identify subtle state shifts.

  • Outputs include soma size and shape remodeling, process length and branching architecture, enabling objective morphology-driven subclassification and continuous state scoring.

Multiplex Phenotyping Aligned to Mechanism-of-Action

  • Microglia state-marker panels combined with Iba1 in mIF, typically up to four targets plus DAPI, optimized for the rodent model, tissue type, and endpoint strategy. Markers can be quantified as stain density in regions-of-interest and within segmented cells to obtain cell-expression profiles. Common markers include:

    • Microglia identity and homeostatic state: TMEM119, CD11b, TSPO

    • Phagolysosomal burden and phagocytic load: LAMP1, CD68

    • Reactive inflammatory activation and immune context: CD45, TREM2

    • Effector-pathway context: iNOS, complement components (for example C1q)

    • Inflammasome engagement: ASC, cleaved caspase-1

    • Purinergic signaling: P2RY12

Pathology Microenvironment Analysis

  • Pathology and microenvironment markers can be integrated to quantify how microglial state varies with local pathologic burden and proximity to pathology-defined foci, enabling spatially resolved niche phenotyping within inflammatory microenvironments. Channels may include:

    • AD models: Aβ plaque markers (fibrillar amyloid, 6E10/4G8, pFTAA) and tau markers (AT8, PHF1, MC1, p-Tau217, cleaved tau N368/Asp412)

    • ALS models: phospho-TDP-43 (p409/410), human TDP-43, total TDP-43

    • MS models: myelin integrity markers (e.g. MBP)

    • Structural and vascular markers: GFAP, laminin

  • Outputs include profiling of metrics such as stain density and microglial morphology as a function of distance to the pathology, and colocalization of specific markers.

Quantification of Microglia-Neuron Direct Interactions

  • By adding a neuronal marker (e.g. NeuN), direct contacts between microglia and neurons can be characterized.

  • Both the size of the interaction and the location (microglia process to neuronal soma or soma-soma) can be quantified automatically.

Well-established protocols for brain sample preparation, staining, slide scanning, and quantitative image analysis.

Our Process for Microglia Staining & Analysis

At Biospective, we have implemented a standardized, highly reproducible multi-step process for staining and analysis of microglia from formalin-fixed brains:

  1. Sample Preparation

    •  High-precision microtome sectioning or cryosectioning of FFPE or fixed-frozen brains.

    • Custom antigen retrieval protocols optimized for Iba1, NeuN, and microglia activation markers, maximizing signal-to-background to support detection of subtle features required for quantitative image analysis. Retrieval conditions are further customized for any additional antibodies included in the multiplex panel. We routinely perform formic acid retrieval, heat-induced retrieval (HIER), enzymatic retrieval, or a combination of these methods.

    • Stringent quality control (QC) of staining quality and specificity as well as tissue integrity.

  2. Staining (IHC or Multiplex IF)

    • Marker panels are configured based on the desired analysis, often combining:

      • Iba1 (microglia)

      • NeuN (neuronal soma; when cell-to-cell interaction endpoints are required)

      • Disease model-relevant pathology (e.g. Aβ, p-tau, p-Syn129, phospho-TDP-43)

      • Microglia state or pathway markers (e.g. CD68, TREM2, ASC)

      • DAPI (nuclei)

    • Advantages of Multiplexing

      • Multiplexing enables cell-type–specific analysis of the microenvironment on a single slide, accurately characterizing the cellular landscape surrounding individual plaques.

  3. Imaging

    • Whole-section multichannel fluorescence scanning

  4. Quantitative Analysis
    We have developed fully-automated quantitative analysis for multiplex immunofluorescence:

    • Fully-automated segmentation for microglia (Iba1), neuronal soma (NeuN), and model-relevant pathology markers

    • High-throughput, region-based reporting of microglial burden and morphology-derived state metrics

    • When NeuN is included, contact analysis resolves two interaction topologies:

      • Microglial process-to-neuronal soma contact

      • Microglial soma-to-neuronal soma contact, including quantitative contact area.

Illustration of Biospective's process of collecting brain tissue samples from animal models, performing tissue sectioning, multiplex immunofluorescence staining, whole slide scanning, and quantitative image analysis.

Sample Collection, Preparation, and Shipping Guidelines

We provide comprehensive support to ensure sample integrity and data reliability:

  • Sample Collection: Animals should be perfused with cold PBS and/or 10% neutral-buffered formalin, and the brains should be carefully extracted.

  • Sample Preparation: Brains must be briefly properly fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin. 

  • Sample Shipping: Samples must be shipped in PBS with sodium azide.

A brief overview of microglial reactivity in neurological disease models and why rigorous quantitative analysis is critical.

Microglia maintain tissue homeostasis through continuous parenchymal surveillance, immune sensing, and tightly regulated phagocytic clearance. In disease, microglia shift into heterogeneous activated states that are regionally patterned and stage-dependent, aligning with selective neuronal vulnerability and the emergence of synaptic and circuit-level dysfunction. These state shifts are mirrored by quantifiable morphological remodeling, including soma hypertrophy and shorter, thicker, and more branched processes.

Functionally, microglia transition from surveillance to an effector state, meaning they shift from primarily sensing and maintaining homeostasis to executing defined response programs that actively modify the local microenvironment, through inflammatory signaling, oxidative mechanisms, complement cascades, and lysosome-coupled phagocytosis.

These structural changes are commonly accompanied by:

  • Increased production and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines

  • Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species generation

  • Complement-associated programs

  • Elevated phagolysosomal and phagocytic load

In normal and pathological conditions, microglia directly interacts with neurons for multiple purposes, such as synapse pruning and development (Paolicelli, 2011; Schafer, 2012) and axonal guidance (Squarzoni, 2014). Recently, specialized sites between microglial process and neuronal soma, termed somatic purinergic junction, have been proposed to be a key site for microglial sensing of neuronal health (Cserép, 2020, 2021). These sites were found to be associated with mitochondria on the neuronal side and the purinergic receptor P2Y12R on the microglia side. While the role of somatic junctions in neurodegenerative disorders remains largely unexplored, several lines of evidence suggest they may be altered, including an increase in the frequency of interactions in an acute brain injury model (Cserép, 2020), mitochondrial dysfunction in these conditions, and Biospective’s research study showing  a strong correlation between these interactions and neurodegeneration in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease.

Together, morphology, effector-pathway engagement, and contact topology provide mechanistically anchored, quantifiable endpoints that link microglial state to neuron-associated engagement within pathology-defined microenvironments, and to downstream neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative phenotypes. Depending on context, these responses can be adaptive, supporting lesion containment, efficient debris clearance, and circuit support via trophic and synapse-modulatory programs, or maladaptive, sustaining inflammatory signaling and inappropriate phagocytic remodeling or removal of stressed yet viable neuronal elements, thereby accelerating circuit dysfunction and neurodegeneration.

A summary of our methods to classify activated microglia.

Overview of Analysis Methodology

  • Cells are detected and segmented on whole slide images using computer vision and deep-learning approaches.

  • Morphological features such as the soma area, the number of branching point in processes, etc. are then extracted.

  • Based on these features, cells are classified as activated or not and are assigned a continuous activation score by a machine learning model.

  • These metrics are then aggregated by neuroanatomical region-of-interest (ROIs), subject, and group for statistical analysis.

Animated workflow for microglia morphology analysis.

What is the Value of Activated Microglia Analysis?

  • Larger effect size than simply quantifying Iba1 stain density. In multiple contexts, such as in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease, Biospective has observed larger effect size in group comparisons using the microglial morphological analysis than measuring the Iba1 stain density. In the context of a preclinical efficacy study, this result means that the same drug effect would be detectable with smaller cohort size.

  • Correlates with translationally relevant clinical metrics. Our microglia morphological analysis has shown strong correlation to translationally relevant clinical metrics, such as motor scores and MRI brain volume, making it a valuable insight into the effects of a putative therapeutics..

A summary of our quantification methods for cell-to-cell interactions and an illustrative example from a TDP-43 ALS mouse model. 

In order to analyze direct interactions between neurons and microglia, we perform multiplex immunofluorescence including microglial (e.g. Iba1) and neuronal (e.g. NeuN) markers in thin tissue sections. Biospective’s platform automatically identifies and quantifies the properties of each interaction:

  • Size: overlap area, fraction of cellular perimeter covered, etc.

  • Type/Subcellular Localization: soma-soma or microglial-process-to-neuronal soma

Aggregate statistics (e.g. fraction of microglia with process-to-soma interactions) can then be calculated by neuroanatomical regions, subjects, and groups for statistical analysis.

To illustrate our workflow, we have applied this image processing & analysis pipeline to mIF images from the brains of a novel TDP-43 proteinopathy mouse model developed by Biospective. Non-transgenic, wild-type (WT) C57BL/6 mice were unilaterally injected with AAV-hTDP43ΔNLS (or AAV-null as a control) into the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc). Brains were collected at 6 weeks post-injection.

In this research study, we found that, compared to controls, the AAV-hTDP43ΔNLS group had:

  • Extensive microgliosis, with a strong increase in the Iba1 stain density and the density of activated microglia obtained from the morphological analysis.

  • More microglia-neuron interactions:

    • A larger fraction of neurons had interactions with microglia.

    • Even though the total number of microglia was highly increased, a larger fraction of microglia had interactions with neurons. Interestingly, this metric had stronger statistical significance than pure microglia-based metrics.

    • A large increase in the density of both microglia-process-to-neuronal soma interactions and soma-soma interactions.

  • A change in the nature of the interactions, as the interactions are larger.

  • These interactions appeared to be a direct microglial response to the pathology: the greater the pathological burden was present within individual cells (as measured by hTDP43/pTDP43 markers), the more likely these cells were to have an interaction.

  • These advanced metrics are therefore highly valuable for preclinical therapeutic efficacy studies.  The higher sensitivity means that a smaller effect size would be detected using the same cohort size. In addition, these metrics offer detailed insights into neuronal health, treatment-related microglial responses to pathology, and microglia-neuron interactions.

Interactive Presentation of Our Research Study

In the "Image Interactive" below, you can find results from our microglia-neuron interaction analysis, including high-resolution Multiplex Immunofluorescence tissue sections of brains from our proprietary inducible TDP-43ΔNLS model and control mice.

Key Advantages of Biospective's Microglia Staining & Analysis Services:

  • High-sensitivity microglia detection

  • Optional staining with markers of microglial phenotype, including custom antibody/marker staining

  • High-throughput, automated whole slide imaging and neuroanatomical region analysis

  • Unique fully-automated quantitative image analysis

    • Microglial morphology and activation states

    • Microglia-neuron interactions

    • Spatial proximity analysis (e.g. Aβ plaques)

  • Cross-species (mouse, rat) compatibility

  • Complementary services (e.g. tissue & fluid cytokine concentrations measured via immunoassays) 

Selection of Amyloid Plaque Environment Metrics provided by Biospective's Platform

Metric

Units

Description

Stain density

Fraction

Fraction of pixels positive for each stain used in mIF or IHC

Density of morphologically reactive microglia

Counts per mm²

Density of microglia classified to a non-ramified morphology state

Mean microglia activation score

Morphology score

Average morphology-derived activation score of detected microglia in an ROI

Fraction of neurons with microglial contacts

Fraction

Fraction of NeuN+ neurons in direct apposition with Iba1+ microglia

Fraction of microglia–neuron contacts that are process-to-soma

Fraction

Fraction of contacts classified as microglial process-to-neuronal soma topology

This table compares the various quantiative microglial metrics provided by Biospective's platform.

We have an active research & innovation (R&I) program with a particular emphasis on interrogating the intricate roles that microglia & astrocytes play in neurodegenerative, neuromuscular, and neuroinflammatory diseases. 

At Biospective, we recognize the key role that neuroinflammation plays in neurological diseases, and the value of targeted therapeutic modulation of neuroinflammatory responses. As part of our internal research and innovation efforts, we are actively working to better understand the involvement of neuroinflammation in disease pathogenesis. Our current activities include:

To discuss your study requirements or request a quote for Microglia Staining and Image Analysis services:

FAQs

What is meant by direct microglia-neuron interactions?

Microglia–neuron interactions refer to direct contacts between microglial structures and neuronal compartments (Cserep, 2021). While there are many (indirect) interactions through soluble factors, direct interactions are defined as those with physical contact between microglia and neurons. Quantifying these contacts provides a mechanism-relevant readout of neuroimmune engagement at the cellular interface, supporting interpretation of neuron-proximal microglial states and their relationship to neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative phenotypes.


How do you distinguish microglial process contacts versus microglial soma contacts to neurons?

Biospective classifies contacts by topology using automated segmentation of microglial processes and soma and NeuN-defined neuronal soma. Process-to-soma contacts are defined by apposition of Iba1-positive processes to the neuronal soma boundary. Soma-to-soma contacts are defined by direct apposition of the microglial cell body to the neuronal soma. Outputs include fraction of neurons contacted, contact burden per neuron or per unit tissue area, contact area, and density or fraction of contact types.


How can microglial activation and interactions be studied at scale?

Multiplex immunofluorescence of whole slide images enables simultaneous measurement of microglia identity, microglial state markers, neurons, and model-relevant pathology on the same section while preserving spatial relationships required for morphology-based phenotyping and contact quantification. Biospective’s fully automated analysis pipelines enable consistent extraction of morphology, proximity, state markers, and contact-topology metrics across 100,000s of individual cells across cohorts.


What are complementary biomarkers for microglia activation and neurodegeneration?

Fluid biomarkers can provide minimally invasive measures of neuroaxonal injury and glial activation (e.g. neurofilament light chain and GFAP), alongside cytokine and chemokine panels when inflammation is a key endpoint. Imaging readouts, particularly MRI-derived volumetry and lesion metrics, provide orthogonal measures of tissue integrity that can be associated with microglial state and neuron-associated contact topology.


Which diseases and conditions are associated with microglial reactivity?

Microglial state shifts and microglial responses are prominent across neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), tauopathy-related dementias (e.g. FTD/PiD, CTE, CBD, PSP), Parkinson’s disease (PD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), multiple sclerosis (MS), and related proteinopathies and demyelinating disorders. These responses are often spatially patterned, stage-dependent, and aligned with regional susceptibility. For more information, visit Microglia Morphology in ALS., Alzheimer’s Disease & Parkinson’s Disease, Microglia, Astrocytes, and α-Synuclein in Parkinson’s Disease, and Microglia, Astrocytes & Tau in Neurodegenerative Diseases.


Can these endpoints be assessed longitudinally?

Histology endpoints are cross-sectional within a given tissue collection. Longitudinal biology is typically addressed through staged cohorts or serial-sacrifice designs, complemented by in vivo imaging. When available, microglia morphology and contact-topology metrics can be associated with MRI-derived measures (for example regional volumetry) to strengthen pharmacodynamic interpretation in matched cohorts.


References

Cserép, C., Pósfai, B., Dénes, Á. Shaping neuronal fate: functional heterogeneity of direct microglia-neuron interactions. Neuron, 109: 222–240, 2021; doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.11.007

Cserép, C., Pósfai, B., Lénárt, N., Fekete, R., László, Z. I., Lele, Z., Orsolits, B., Molnár, G., Heindl, S., Schwarcz, A. D., Ujvári, K., Környei, Z., Tóth, K., Szabadits, E., Sperlágh, B., Baranyi, M., Csiba, L., Hortobágyi, T., Maglóczky, Z., Martinecz, B., … Dénes, Á. Microglia monitor and protect neuronal function through specialized somatic purinergic junctions. Science, 367: 528–537, 2020; doi:10.1126/science.aax6752

Paolicelli, R.C., Bolasco, G., Pagani, F., Maggi, L., Scianni, M., Panzanelli, P., Giustetto, M., Ferreira, T.A., Guiducci, E., Dumas, L., Ragozzino, D., Gross, C.T. Synaptic pruning by microglia is necessary for normal brain development. Science, 333: 1456–1458, 2011; doi:10.1126/science.1202529

Schafer, D.P., Lehrman, E.K., Kautzman, A.G., Koyama, R., Mardinly, A.R., Yamasaki, R., Ransohoff, R.M., Greenberg, M.E., Barres, B.A., Stevens, B. Microglia Sculpt Postnatal Neural Circuits in an Activity and Complement-Dependent Manner. Neuron, 74: 691–705, 2012; doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.026

Squarzoni, P., Oller, G., Hoeffel, G., Pont-Lezica, L., Rostaing, P., Low, D., Bessis, A., Ginhoux, F., Garel, S. Microglia modulate wiring of the embryonic forebrain. Cell Rep., 8: 1271–1279, 2014; doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.042


Keywords

Accuracy: the closeness of a measured value to a standard or known true value. It is a measure of the correctness of a measurement or the extent to which an estimate represents the actual value. High accuracy indicates that the measurement or prediction is very close to the true value. 

Axonal Injury: damage to the neuronal axon. 

Biomarker: a measurable indicator of a biological state or condition. Biomarkers are often used in medicine and research to detect or monitor the presence, progress, or severity of a disease, as well as to assess the effectiveness of a treatment. 

Brain Atrophy: reduction in volume or thickness of the entire brain or regions of the brain. 

Cytokine: a protein that serves as a signalling molecule among immune system cells. Cytokines are classified into interleukins, interferons, tumour necrosis factors (TNF), chemokines, colony-stimulating factors, and transforming growth factors. Depending on their role in the immune response, cytokines can be categorized as pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory. 

Damage Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs): endogenous signals released from injured, stressed, or dying cells, such as extracellular ATP or uric acid crystals, that alert the immune system to tissue damage. These signals can activate the inflammasome, promoting inflammatory responses. 

Inflammasome: a cytosolic multiprotein complex that assembles in response to pathogen-associated or damage-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs/DAMPs). It typically consists of a pattern recognition receptor (e.g. NLRP3), the adaptor protein ASC, and pro-caspase-1. Upon activation, it mediates caspase-1-dependent maturation of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18 and induces pyroptosis, contributing to innate immune defense and inflammatory pathology. 

Lysosome: a membrane-bound degradative organelle in eukaryotic cells, responsible for digesting lipids, proteins, and other macromolecules. 

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): a non-invasive imaging modality that uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency (RF) pulses to generate images. 

Microglia: one of the neuroglial cell types present in the brain and spinal cord. Constituting approximately 10-15% of the total cellular population in the brain, microglial cells function as the primary immune cells of the central nervous system. These cells are essential for maintaining homeostasis, clearing cellular debris, and providing critical support functions within the brain. 

Microglia Morphometrics: quantitative measures of microglia morphology, such as cell area, soma perimeter, number of branching points in processes’ skeleton, etc. 

Neurodegeneration: a complex, multifactorial process resulting in the loss of neurons. 

Neuroinflammation: an inflammatory response within the central nervous system (CNS), primarily involving the activation of microglia and astrocytes. This process can be triggered by various factors, including infections, traumatic brain injury, toxic metabolites, and autoimmune diseases. 

Precision: a measure used to assess the accuracy of a predictive model, especially in classification tasks. It refers to the proportion of true positive predictions out of all positive predictions made by the model. In other words, precision tells us how many of the predicted positive instances are actually correct. 

Reactive Microglia: microglia that are responding to or reacting to a particular condition. The name was proposed by Paolicelli et al. (Paolicelli, 2022) in lieu of the discouraged term “activated” microglia, emphasizing that microglia can have many different “reactive states” in health and disease. 

Region of Interest (ROI): a specific subset of data identified within an image. For volumetric analysis the ROIs correspond to neuroanatomical structures and parcellated features. 

Spatiotemporal Pattern: a pattern with both spatial and time components. 

Translational Biomarker: a robust indicator of a biological state or process that is measurable in both animal models and humans.


Related Content

Up-to-date information on Microglia and Neuroinflammation.

More Information

Let us know what you’re interested in. Our team will be happy to discuss with you!

Email us at i[email protected] or simply complete & submit the form below. 

Name*
Email*
Purpose of Inquiry*
Affiliation (Company/Institution)*
Message*

Your privacy is important to us. We will protect your data as outlined in our Privacy Notice.

I agree to the terms in the Privacy Notice*

We use necessary cookies to make our site work. We also use other cookies to help us make improvements by measuring how you use the site or for marketing purposes. You have the choice to accept or reject them all. For more detailed information about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Notice.